|
 Reader Comments
MITCHELL K SCHICK
Republican Judge Mitch Schick of the Coles county court
house in Charleston Illinois, has illegally violated general
assembly law 14.5 (a) concerning firearms; he has violated
Illinois, and federal constitutional laws and his oath to
protect the constitution, which is an act of treason. I have
notified the FBI of this matter. Judge MITCH SCHICK is
trying to cover this matter up, hoping it will go away. I
have solid evidence (documentation) from the Coles County
Court house that proves that he illegally seized my two guns
without having any reason to do this illegal act. I had no
criminal recorded anywhere recorded, and he gave me no trial
to defend my self in court by law, he took them before I
even had the chance to show up for my court date to defend
myself, which is a violation of 14.5 (a) Illinois law. He
ordered this action to seize my guns violating every law
written to protect the common citizen. Judge Mitch Shick is
working above the law, and must be accountable for his
actions. I have also notified Senator Dale Righter from
Illinois of this matter. I am waiting to see if he will obey
the law and take proper action. It has been two weeks now
and no response from Righter.
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under
color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to
willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person
those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected
by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.
This law further prohibits a person acting under color of
law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to willfully
subject or cause to be subjected any person to different
punishments, pains, or penalties, than those prescribed for
punishment of citizens on account of such person being an
alien or by reason of his/her color or race.
Acts under "color of any law" include acts not only done by
federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or
limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without
and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided
that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done
under "color of any law," the unlawful acts must be done
while such official is purporting or pretending to act in
the performance of his/her official duties. This definition
includes, in addition to law enforcement officials,
individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing
Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are
bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs.
Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one
year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts
include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a
dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or
imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results, or
if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap,
aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated
sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under
this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life,
or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Please if anyone else has been criminally violated by Judge
Mitchell K Schick. Notified the FBI and the Illinois
Judicial Inquiry Board, to file a complaint.
HB1106 - 11 - LRB095 09700 RLC 29902 b ILLINOIS GENERAL
ASSEMBLY LAW 14.5(a) Protection Order
1 When there’s evidence to use firearms illegally against
the petitioner, and the
2 respondent is present in court, or has failed to appear
3 after receiving actual notice, the court shall examine on
4 oath the petitioner, and any witnesses who may be
produced.
5 If the court is satisfied that there is any danger of the
6 illegal uses of firearms, it shall include in the order of
7 protections the requirement that any firearms in the
8 possession of the respondent, except as provided in
9 subsections (b), be turned over to the local law
enforcement
10 agencies for safekeeping. If the respondent fails to
appear,
11 or refuses or fails to surrender his or her firearms, the
12 court shall issue a warrant for seizure of any firearm in
13 the possession of the respondent. The period of
safekeeping
14 shall be for a stated period of time not to exceed 2
years.
15 The firearm or firearms shall be returned to the
respondent
16 at the end of the stated period or at expiration of the
17 order of protection, whichever is sooner.
I NEVER GOT A TRIAL TO DEFEND MYSELF IN COURT, AND JUDGE MITCHELL K SCHICK ORDERED MY TWO GUNS THAT HAD NEVER BEENFIRED TO BE SEIZED. HE HAD NO EVIDIENCE TO JUSTFIE THIS ACTION AGAINST ME. THIS CRIMINAL ACT IS AGAINST EVERY LAW WRITTEN IN THIS COUNTRY. I HAD NO POLICE RECORD NOTED ANYWHERE. I SERVED HONROBALLY IN THE ARMY, AIRFORCE; AND FOUGHT IN THE GULF WAR TO PROTECT OUR RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS. THIS JUDGE IS OUT OF CONTROL AND MUST BE ACCOUTABLE FOR HIS ACTION. ONE OTHER THING, SENATOR OBAMA OF ILLINOIS, IS SUPPOSE TO BE LOOKING INTO THIS CRIMINAL ACT AGAINST ME, SO THERE IS SOME HOPE TO PROTECT OUR RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTION.
Posted: 2007-07-20 16:59:12
By:True LAW
|
|
Mitchell K Shick and A G Webber IV
I think everyone should be aware of the common thread with regards to Judge Mitchell Shick Judge A G Webber IV and others. That common thread is Republican Supreme Court Justice Rita Garman of Danville Illinois. She is appointing Republican cronies to the bench and we are all suffering for it. I read a blog where Judge Albert Webber and his dad (Fourth District Justice A G Webber III) Gave Rita Garman money for her political campaign for the Illinois Supreme Court. Ironically, the gun lobby gave Rita Garman Money also. As you know Rita Garman wrote the opinion overturning a verdict against a gun manufacture. But in the same breath she will support her appointee in taking your guns and ignoring the constitution. I think it’s sad what happening to the court system in central and southern Illinois. The system is rotten from the top down. Unless you are a big corporation or spend a lot of money paying big politically connected law firms you have no rights in the courts. No Rights to due process. I saw where this woman paid a republican law firm in Decatur Illinois $300,000 in a child custody case and the judge (A G Webber IV) gave this one woman’s kids to a non parent and forced her to pay child support. Three Hundred Thousand Dollars!!! Who has that kind of money to pay a law firm? It has been widely reported that Rita Garman spent over a Million Dollars to get elected to her Supreme Court seat. I hope you keep fighting for your rights under the Constitution.
Posted: 2007-09-18 13:26:57
By:Trish
|
|
bekkbssw
[URL=http://znfivbty.com]ifbzqttf[/URL] kmkomjbn http://uqzdecsg.com sdeslpzw bgnmbtav orvnsftx
Posted: 2007-11-02 21:22:57
By:bekkbssw
|
|
[+ Add Your Comment]
|
|
|
|
|